Legal Opinion
Edizone, LLC v. Asia Focus International Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided July 21, 2016No. Case No. 2:15-cv-00614-JNP-PMWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jill N. Parrish, United States District Court Judge
INTRODUCTION
Edizone, LLC (“Edizone”) brings this action against Defendant Asia Focus International Group, Inc. (“AFIG”), claiming that AFIG has infringed on Edizone’s patent. AFIG moves to dismiss on the basis that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over it. Alternatively, AFIG moves to transfer the case to California. The court held a hearing on AFIG’s motion on May 6, 2016.
Edizone has met its burden of showing that AFIG has sufficient contacts with Utah to allow the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over its patent claims.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alfwear v. Ibkul UbhotDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- Bodied By Bella Boutique v. Bodyed By BellaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
- Bodied By Bella Boutique v. Bodyed By BellaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- Brumate, Inc. v. Walmart Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- DP Creations v. Adolly.comDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.