Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 6, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Contract on an alleged oral contract of insurance upon the life of William J. Cameron, the plaintiff’s intestate. Writ dated April 2, 1895. The case was tried in the Superior Court before Fessenden, J. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the judge ruled that upon all the evidence the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and ordered a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover $10,000 on an alleged oral contract of the defendant to insure the life of his intestate. He introduced evidence tending to show that one Cooper was the general agent of the defendant company for Western New York, who resided and had his place of business at Syracuse in that State; that Alvi T. Baldwin, a brother of the plaintiff, lived in Mayville, New York, doing business in Rochester, and knew Cooper several years as a life insurance agent in Syracuse; that through him this brother took out two policies of insurance on his own life in the defendant company,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claflin v. United States Credit System Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Reliance Mutual Insurance v. SawyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gordon v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. O'Brien v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. DeCesare v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Austin v. Dixie Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Blaisdell v. Hersum & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API