Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. Smith
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Ax, P. J.
The appellant by its purported petition for rehearing has presented no issue for the consideration of this court by reason of its failure to comply with Rule 2-22 of our Supreme and Appellate Courts in “stating concisely the reasons why the decision is thought to be erroneous.”
Appellant has merely stated seventeen conclusions in its petition, none of which concisely point out why the decision of our court is thought to be erroneous.
A petition for a rehearing, under the rules of appellate procedure, is a pleading and not a mere argument or brief. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ConoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. RichIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
- Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Guthrie v. BLAKELYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.