Legal Opinion
In Suk Pak v. United States of America Department of Agriculture
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 1987No. Civ. A. 87-0342PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition.
Background
In Suk Pak is an individual who owns and operates Penny’s Food Market in York, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff was approved for participation in the food stamp program which is administered by the defendant United States Department of Agriculture. On January 14, 1985 a representative of defendant wrote to plaintiff, warning plaintiff about possible violations of the food stamp program’s regulations. The letter indicates that another…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Board of Ed., Island Trees Union Free School Dist. No. 26 v. PicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Frisby v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Willy's Grocery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Langston v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charlotte Freedman, Owner, Superior Stores Number 3 v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- 610 CONVENIENCE STORE & DELI V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- ERNIES MARKET V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- In Suk Pak, T/d/b/a Penny's Food Market v. U.S., Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- MARTINEZ GROCERY II v. UNITED STATESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019