Legal Opinion

People v. Cabrera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that he was denied the right to proceed pro se because the jail in which he was held had an inadequate law library. There is no “abstract, free-standing right to a law library or legal assistance” (Lewis v Casey, 518 US 343, 351). County Court properly fashioned a reasonable alternative “to assure meaningful access to the courts” (Bounds v Smith, 430 US 817, 830). Defendant also contends that the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss at the close of the People’s case because the People had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. CastanedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2002
  2. Cabrera v. HerbertDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API