Legal Opinion
Bruce H. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF HANOVER, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 30, 1997No. 96-2144PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Bruce King (“King”) worked for the Hanover Department of Public Works (“DFW”) as a heavy equipment operator and truck driver. King was supervised by Leo Hamill (“Hamill”) from July 1991 onward. Hamill’s immediate supervisor was Richard Hauger (“Hauger”). In March 1993, Hauger informed King that he had decided to take disciplinary action for incidents in which King was alleged to have destroyed town property. King was suspended for one week without pay and placed on probation for ninety days. After receiving notice of the suspension and probation,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Kosereis v. Department forCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Thompson v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Pomerleau v. West Springfield Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.