Legal Opinion
Hallinan v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 8, 2007No. Civil Action 06-1706 (RMC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Patrick and Suzanne Hallinan filed a pro se Complaint against the United States alleging that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), through its “principals, officers, agents, and/or employees,” violat ed various sections of the Internal Revenue Code and the Code of Federal Regulations. See Compl. at 4-17. This is one of numerous pro se boilerplate complaints that have recently been filed in the this Court alleging a litany of tax code violations against the IRS. See, e.g., Gaines v. United States, 424 F.Supp.2d 219, 221 (D.D.C.2006)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Pollinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Diffenderfer v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Whittington v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lykens v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.