Legal Opinion

Maher v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 2009No. 1843 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Joseph P. Maher (Claimant), proceeding pro se, petitions for review from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the Referee’s decision denying him unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law)1 because he was discharged for willful misconduct when he failed to comply with Karoly Law Offices’ (Employer) directive to timely file a court document. Because Claimant has failed to preserve any issues for appeal, the order of the Board is affirmed.

Claimant was employed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Jimoh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Deal v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Pearson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Patla v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A.D. Medlen, III v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. D. Sease v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. In Re: Order Amending Rule 1513 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate ProcedureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. J.J. Hassler v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Maher v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API