Philadelphia National Bank v. Buchman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Maxey,
This is a suit in assumpsit to recover on three promissory notes, each for three months, in the respective sums of $2,500, $1,000, and $3,500, made by defendants to the order of themselves. Each note was endorsed in blank and discounted at the Central Trust & Savings Company of Philadelphia (hereinafter referred to as the trust company). The respective dates of these notes were September 2, 1931, September 16, 1931, and September 23, 1931.
The statement of claim declares that “before the date of maturity of each of said notes, Central Trust and Savings Company of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mumford v. CoghlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Murray v. KeyesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
- Wood v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Anaheim National Bank v. DolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. LewingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wrenfield Homeowners Ass'n v. DeYoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Thornburgh v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Negro Nest, LLC v. Mid-Northern Management, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Mattingly Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Poelcher v. ZinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.