United States v. Alejandro Burgos-Ortega
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Alejandro BurgosOrtega pled guilty to illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and received a 46-month sentence. Burgos-Ortega challenges his sentence on appeal, arguing that 1) the district court erred when it applied a 12-level increase to his offense level based on a Washington State drug conviction; 2) the district court erred by basing its sentence on facts not in the record; and 3) his above-Sentencing Guidelines sentence was substantively unreasonable. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Jose Valdivia-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Elisio Atenia Lorenzo v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Jeffery HavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Martin Vega-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Urbano Torres-GilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.