Legal Opinion

In re Ah Sam

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1918No. 1087PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Second Circuit. Hon. W. S. Edings, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KEMP, J.

The defendant, James Akina, plaintiff in error, was found by a jury in the juvenile court of the second circuit to be the father of the bastard child of one Mary Ah Sam and the court entered a judgment requiring him to pay to its mother for support-, maintenance and education of said child the sum of $240 per annum in monthly instalments of $20 each until said child reaches the age of fourteen years. From this judgment the defendant comes to this court on writ or error and assigns five grounds as f oIIoavs :

“1. That the court erred in allowing the petitioner…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stubblefield v. WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Hutchinson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Clark v. BradstreetSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  4. Risk v. State ex rel. VestalIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Scott v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Almeida v. CorreaHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kometani v. HeathHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Gelber v. Sheraton-Hawaii CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Tax Appeals Nos. 529 to 591Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. DuvauchelleHawaii Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API