Legal Opinion
Henderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 29, 1986No. 85 C 6692PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Before the Court are the plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery and motion concerning Kelly Zanders. Pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 37(a), the Court orders the defendant to comply with and answer certain of the plaintiff’s discovery requests as set forth in the text of this opinion. The Court also allows communications with Kelly Zanders as governed by certain restrictions. For the reasons stated herein, the plaintiff’s motions are granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTS
This dispute arises out of a claim of race discrimination on the part of the National Railroad…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Claxton L. Burns, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Thiokol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. PlankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States of America and William C. McCormick Special Agent, Irs v. J. Martin LawlessCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cesena v. Du Page CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Sánchez-Medina v. Unicco Service Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Ladson v. Ulltra East Parking Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Cesena v. Du Page CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Vincent Artis v. Phelps Memorial Hospital Association and Northwell HealthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026