Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Dupuis

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1988No. 88-106PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

The State Compensation Insurance Fund (State) appeals from a judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court. The Workers’ Compensation Court held that the claimant, James Hurley, Jr. (Hurley) is entitled to benefits under Section 39-71-703, MCA, based on Hurley’s testimony that he was once employed at the rate of $12.44 an hour on a part-time basis and that this amount established his preinjury earning capacity. We reverse.

The State presents the following issue for our consideration:

Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in calculating Hurley’s entitlement to wage loss benefits pursuant to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Shupert v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Jones v. St. Regis Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Snyder v. San Francisco Feed & GrainMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Thomas v. WhitesideMontana Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chagnon v. TILLEMAN INSURANCE CO.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Reeverts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Chagnon v. TILLEMAN INSURANCE CO.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Chagon v. Tilleman Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Combs v. Wagar LoggingMontana Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API