Hurley v. Dupuis
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson
The State Compensation Insurance Fund (State) appeals from a judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court. The Workers’ Compensation Court held that the claimant, James Hurley, Jr. (Hurley) is entitled to benefits under Section 39-71-703, MCA, based on Hurley’s testimony that he was once employed at the rate of $12.44 an hour on a part-time basis and that this amount established his preinjury earning capacity. We reverse.
The State presents the following issue for our consideration:
Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in calculating Hurley’s entitlement to wage loss benefits pursuant to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- Shupert v. Anaconda Aluminum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
- Jones v. St. Regis Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- Snyder v. San Francisco Feed & GrainMontana Supreme Court · 1987
- Thomas v. WhitesideMontana Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chagnon v. TILLEMAN INSURANCE CO.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
- Reeverts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
- Chagnon v. TILLEMAN INSURANCE CO.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
- Chagon v. Tilleman Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
- Combs v. Wagar LoggingMontana Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.