Legal Opinion

Dorchester Manor v. Borough of New Milford

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 18, 1994PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

287 N.J. Super. 163 (1994)

670 A.2d 600

DORCHESTER MANOR, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

BOROUGH OF NEW MILFORD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County.

Decided November 18, 1994.

Gary D. Gordon, for plaintiff (Feinstein, Raiss & Kelin, attorneys).

Sheri K. Siegelbaum, of counsel, for defendant (Scarinci & Hollenbeck, attorneys).

KOLE, J.A.D., Retired and Temporarily Assigned on Recall.

Dorchester Manor (Dorchester or plaintiff), instituted this suit against the Borough of New Milford (the Borough or defendant),…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Borough of West Caldwell v. Borough of CaldwellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Lavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Michaels v. Brookchester, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Clark v. JudgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Goods v. Lackawanna Leather Co.s.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Knorr v. SmealSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. County of Morris v. FauverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. United States v. ScurrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Chance v. McCannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  5. Dorchester Manor v. Borough of New MilfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API