Legal Opinion

Dorchester Manor v. Borough of New Milford

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 23, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

287 N.J. Super. 114 (1996)

670 A.2d 576

DORCHESTER MANOR, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

BOROUGH OF NEW MILFORD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 12, 1995.

Decided January 23, 1996.

Before Judges DREIER and ARNOLD M. STEIN.

Gary D. Gordon argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Feinstein, Raiss & Kelin, attorneys; Mr. Gordon on the brief).

Paul P. Josephson argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Sills, Cummis, Zuckerman, Radin…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Dorchester Manor v. Borough of New MilfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Knorr v. SmealSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. County of Morris v. FauverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. United States v. ScurrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Chance v. McCannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  5. Town of Secaucus v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API