Legal Opinion

State v. De La Monica.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1947No. 38620Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

A. G. Rickerfor, surety on the appearance bond of Sylvester de la Monica, prosecutes this appeal from a judgment forfeiting the bond because of de la Monica’s failure to appear on the date set for his trial, it being Rickerfor’s contention that the judgment is illegal because the state failed to prove his signature on the bond.

There was no special denial of his signature by the appellant. Its genuineness was not, therefore, at issue. The bond is in the record and it appears on its face to have been signed and acknowledged under oath by the appellant in the presence of Julian…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. Succession of LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  2. Hyde v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  3. State v. BoisseauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  4. Hughes v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1829
  5. Miller v. CoheaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1830

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API