Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1829PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the court of the seventh district, the judge of the district presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.

This case has been already before the court, and was remanded. Vol. 7. It was an action on a promissory note, by which the husband and wife jointly and severally promised to pay Ailes & Morris the sum, of $482 16, for articles furnished them for their and plantation use, as per account rendered. Judgment was rendered, in the first instance, against the wife for the whole amount, and the note, on the face, purporting to be for objects furnished for both husband and wife, that judgment was reversed, as the latter was made responsible for a debt, some part of which was the husband’s.

On the cause…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. De La Monica.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API