Legal Opinion
Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 29, 1986No. 85-1201PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
On November 17, 1983 petitioner Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) a new rate schedule setting forth the rates, terms, and conditions for interruptible transportation service (Rate Schedule IT). See 18 C.F.R. § 157.45 and Part 284 (1985). Under that rate schedule, Tennessee made available interruptible transportation service to pipeline customers and local distribution companies. Tennessee undertook to use its “best…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Kansas Cities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Kansas Gas and Electric Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Northern Municipal Distributors Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Reservation Telephone Cooperative v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LP.. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Reservation Telephone Cooperative v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.