Legal Opinion

Kuehne v. Samedan Oil Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1981No. 5428PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

Appellants brought an action against ap-pellees for cancellation of an oil and gas lease as it applied to a portion of the lands included in the leasehold. They alleged that the interest holders failed to comply with implied covenants for further exploration and reasonable development. Appel-lees moved for summary judgment. The motion was granted, the district judge finding there was no issue of material fact and that appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and judgment was rendered forthwith pursuant to Rule 56, W.R. C.P.

On appeal appellants present as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Knudson v. HilzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. Pennzoil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Examination Management Services, Inc. v. KirschbaumWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Albrecht v. Zwaanshoek Holding en Financiering, B.V.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wyoming Game & Fish Commission v. Mills Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Dudley v. East Ridge Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API