Legal Opinion

Thrush v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1912No. 7879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. George W. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

This is an action in quo' warrcmto in the name of the people on relation of the district attorney, requiring the respondent (plaintiff in error here) to show cause by what authority he continues to hold and exercise the duties of the office of justice of the peace within and for the city and county of Denver.

The respondent in liis answer sets forth, that at the general election for county and state officers held in said city and county on the second Tuesday of November, 1910, he was elected to said office for a term of two years, commencing with the 2nd day of January, 1911, at which time he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. CassidaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. RinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. People ex rel. Fairall v. SabinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Meller v. Municipal CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. McNichols v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  5. City & County of Denver v. RinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API