Legal Opinion
Hake v. Coach
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Bill for a partnership accounting. Defendant appealed from an order referring-the case to a special commissioner to state the account. The facts are stated in the opinion. .
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Motion is made in this Court to dismiss the appeal of the defendant from an order or decree of the court below. The complainant contends that the order or decree is not appealable.
The decree made below is as follows:
“1. That the said parties entered into a copartnership in the year 1885, for the purpose of carrying on a lumbering business in the Upper Peninsula in the State of Michigan in lumbering certain lands then owned by the parties in common.
*426“2. That, by the terms of said partnership, the complainant was to furnish money to carry on said business, and the defendant was to take charge of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barry v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Petrie v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Lewis v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Candler v. StangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Marquam v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Rickman v. RickmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- National Brake & Electric Co. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
- Cooper v. LabudaMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.