Burford v. Kephart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentRiley, J.
I cannot agree that the rule of law stated in the syllabus of majority opinion is correct.
The action below was one to vacate a decree and quiet title to church property located in Wellston, Oklahoma.
A decree quieting title to the property in Luella E. Burford et al. had been entered by the same nisi prius court on May 2, 1942, more than two. years prior to commencement of the last proceedings, and as found by the trial court as a part of its last decree, the prior decree was based on fraud of the successful parties, to wit, Luella' E. Burford and Luella E. Burford, executrix of Wm. R.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Caulk v. LoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Griffin v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Warren v. DodrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Hewins v. WalbeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.