Legal Opinion

Armourdale State Bank v. Hoel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1926No. 26,396PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This action was brought by the Armourdale State Bank against J. A. Hoel, in which it asked a recovery against the defendant for having wrongfully and fraudulently procured the cashing of a check upon which payment had been stopped by the drawer, and of which stoppage of payment the defendant had knowledge.

There was testimony to the effect that in a transaction between a depositor of the bank named Heeter and defendant Hoel, Heeter gave Hoel a check for $1,000. The check was given late in the *131afternoon and was presented by an agent of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Denny v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Brenner v. BigelowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Smith v. Eureka BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Mound City Mutual Life Insurance v. TwiningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Durkin v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Hess v. EmerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Staples v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Barstow v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API