Legal Opinion

Lauson v. Stop-N-Go Foods, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided November 20, 1990No. CIV-89-0030SPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

(Motion in Limine)

SKRETNY, District Judge.

Defendant Stop-N-Go Foods, Inc. brings the present motion in limine, seeking the Court’s permission to use as evidence in chief at trial the deposition testimony of Harold A. Mather, a non-party witness. In support of the motion, defendant submits the affidavit of its attorney, Robert A. Doren (“Doren. aff.”), a memorandum of law (“Memo”) and a reply memorandum of law (“Reply Memo”). In opposition, plaintiff submits the affidavit of her attorney, Charles L. Davis (“Davis aff.”), and a memorandum of law (“Davis Memo”).

For the reasons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Federal Aviation Administration and United States of America v. M. Marshall Landy and International Aircraft Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Houser v. Snap-On Tools CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  4. Duttle v. Bandler & KassDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  5. Wong Ho, as Guardian Ad Litem of Wong Kwok Wei v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thaler v. PRB Metal Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API