Legal Opinion
Thaler v. PRB Metal Products, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 19, 1993No. CV 91-2563PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
Irwin Thaler, plaintiff in the instant case, seeks recovery under CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607 for response costs allegedly incurred in connection with an alleged environmental clean-up of his property which was classified as an inactive hazardous waste site by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Now before the Court is defendants’ motion, pursuant to Rule 39(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to strike the jury demand. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.
On or about July 15, 1991, when plaintiff filed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Whiting v. Jackson State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- Susan D. Bereda, and Cross-Appellee v. Pickering Creek Industrial Park, Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Cleveland J. Stockton and Dorothy Altman Stockton v. John A. Altman, and Eleanor Altman CurranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Colleen P. Kramer v. Banc of America Securities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Viking Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Kramer, Colleen P. v. Banc AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004