Legal Opinion

Durr v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1906PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff fell while walking on a street in the city of Rome, at a place where such street is crossed by the tracks of the defendant's railroad. This action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries received by such fall. At the crossing there are four sets of railroad tracks numbered one, two, three and four from the south. The sidewalk, as it approaches the crossing, is surfaced with gravel. The defendant, a few months previous to the accident, had raised its tracks and on each side of each rail it had placed plank level with the top of the rails. Between the plank, and also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beltz v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Mullins v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Hamilton v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Payne v. . Troy Boston Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Allen v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Butler v. . Village of OxfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Terry v. . Village of PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Annino v. City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Maloid v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Cornell v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API