Legal Opinion

Turner v. Hostetler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1986No. 00269PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from an Order denying appellants’ exceptions to a decree nisi, and making that decree final, which decree called for specific performance of a land sales contract entered into by appellants and appellees.

Appellants raise several issues on appeal which deal with the propriety of allowing the admission of parol evidence to explain circumstances before, during, and after the formation of the contract; the correctness of the findings of the trial court; and the propriety of entering specific performance in this case.

We have reviewed the record and briefs of counsel…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Suchan Et Ux. v. SwopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Pierro v. PierroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Prager v. McAdamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Powell v. PowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Krebs v. United Refining Co. of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Geisinger Clinic v. Di CuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Matthews, J. v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Matthews, J. v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API