Baker v. Webb
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentKeller, Justice
Because the majority has literally “thrown the baby out with the bathwater” in this case, I respectfully dissent and vote to affirm the trial court’s order denying Appellants’ motion to intervene in the underlying adoption proceeding. I share the majority’s frustration with what appears to be a continuing failure on the part of the Cabinet for Families and Children (“the Cabinet”) to follow its own policies and procedures in adoption cases.1 However, the apparent equitable position of Appellants vis-a-vis the Cabinet does nothing to alter the fact that Appellants’ motion to intervene was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Winn v. First Bank of IrvingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Baker v. WebbKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Commonwealth, Department of Child Welfare v. JarboeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- In Re Interest of Kayle C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.