Koenig v. Whatcom Falls Mill Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered April 29, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for trespass.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the cutting and removal of timber which is claimed to be the property of the plaintiff. A trial before the court and a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendants have appealed. Among other *633errors assigned, is the denial by the trial court of appellants’ motion for a new trial, made upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. In view of our conclusions upon the questions presented by this assignment, we deem it unnecessary to notice other contentions of counsel.
Appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Welever v. Advance Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Pederson v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- Corbitt v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Wait v. Robertson Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hale v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Martin v. NeeleyWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Washington Nickel Mining & Alloys, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Commercial Bank v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Calhoun v. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919