Legal Opinion
Clark v. Prime
Bergen County Circuit Court, N.J.
Decided April 17, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barbour, C. C. J.
The above matter comes before the court on a rule to show cause why the verdict against the defendants and in favor of Joseph T. Clark, administrator ad prosequendum of the estate of Marguerite Clark, deceased, in the sum of $30,000 should not be set aside as excessive.
The jury also returned verdicts against the same defendants in favor of Virginia Clark, by her next friend Joseph T. Clark, for personal injuries, $2,000; Joseph T. Clark, administrator of the estate of Marguerite Clark, deceased, for pain and suffering while she lived, $500; Joseph T. Clark, individually, for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tilley v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Tilley v. . the H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Froeming v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Aronson v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Meehan v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Rodriquez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Elizabeth v. Conemaugh Black Lick RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Bohrman v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- McStay v. PrzychockiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.