Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Weiss

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2009No. 543 CAPPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

In this appeal we decide whether the award of a new trial to Ronald Lee Weiss (“Appellee”) by the Indiana County Court of Common Pleas (“PCRA court”) is supported by the record and is free of legal error. Specifically, we determine whether the PCRA court properly granted Appellee a new trial on the basis that the prosecutor withheld information that could have been used to impeach the credibility of two Commonwealth witnesses, in violation of Brady v. Maryland.1 Additionally, we determine whether a conflict of interest claim raised in Appellee’s PCRA petition has been…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API