Cecilia ESPINOZA and Rudolfo Espinoza, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FARAH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to decide which practices Congress intended to prohibit when it made it unlawful for an employer “to fail or refuse to hire . . . any individual . . . because of such individual’s . . . national origin.” 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-2(a) (1). More precisely, we must determine whether the words “national origin” should be read to mean, or at least include, “citizenship.” Since we conclude they should not; that none of the reasons offered for doing so will withstand close analysis; that this is one of those cases where Congress should be taken at its words;…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Guerra v. Manchester Terminal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Carroll v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Charles Watkins v. United Steel Workers Of America, Local No. 2369Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.