Legal Opinion

Cecilia ESPINOZA and Rudolfo Espinoza, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FARAH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 21, 1972No. 71-3364PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide which practices Congress intended to prohibit when it made it unlawful for an employer “to fail or refuse to hire . . . any individual . . . because of such individual’s . . . national origin.” 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-2(a) (1). More precisely, we must determine whether the words “national origin” should be read to mean, or at least include, “citizenship.” Since we conclude they should not; that none of the reasons offered for doing so will withstand close analysis; that this is one of those cases where Congress should be taken at its words;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Guerra v. Manchester Terminal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Carroll v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  5. Charles Watkins v. United Steel Workers Of America, Local No. 2369Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API