Legal Opinion
Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 20, 1974No. Civ. A. 72-169PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEBER, District Judge.
The two named Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all other female technical employees employed in Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s Claims Department (the Company) have filed a Complaint charging that the Company discriminated against women in hiring, job classification, promotions, and in the compensation and job benefits they received for the jobs they were allowed to hold.
The Representative Plaintiffs are Sandra Wetzel, a woman, who was hired by Defendant Company as a “Claims Representative” in July 1967, and Mari Ross, who was hired by Defendant…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Union Free School District No. 6 v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Cedar Rapids Community School District v. ParrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.