State v. Vanderbilt
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Appellant was found guilty of distributing one gram of cocaine to an undercover officer. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. We affirm.
Most of the issues raised by the appellant are not properly before this Court because no objections were made at trial. Even though no contemporaneous and proper objections were taken at trial, appellant argues that this Court should review his arguments as a “matter of grace.” For this proposition, appellant relies on State v. Griffin, 129 S. C. 200, 124 S. E. 81 (1924). In Griffin, the Court stated that this Court is bound to take notice of any error…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GoolsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- State v. SachsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- State v. NewtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. ChildsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.