Legal Opinion

Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 10, 1975No. 48215PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Justice:

Here we are concerned with the question: Can an insured sue his insurer directly without first suing the uninsured motorist tort-feasor where the identity of the uninsured motorist is known and he is subject to process?

Title 36 O.S. § 3636 contains the requirement for compulsory uninsured motorist coverage in Oklahoma. The part of that statute pertinent to this case is (B), paragraph two:

“The uninsured motorist coverage shall be upon a form approved by the State Board for Property and Casualty Rates as otherwise provided in the Insurance Code and may provide that the parties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Boughton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Holt v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Schmidt v. Farmers Elevator Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. High v. Southwestern Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Buzzard v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Reese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API