Schlimgen v. MAY TRUCKING COMPANY
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
In this wrongful death action, defendant contends that the trial court erred by giving a verdict-urging instruction after the presiding juror had informed the court that the jury was deadlocked. The Court of Appeals reversed on the ground that the instruction was coercive. Schlimgen v. May Trucking Co., 178 Or App 397, 410, 37 P3d 1005 (2001). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to that court for further consideration.
Plaintiff is the personal representative of Michael Schlimgen, who was killed in an accident near an on-ramp to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. MarshOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Peterson v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Schlimgen v. May Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
3Cited by7 opinions
- Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Peiffer v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Gessele v. Jack In The Box Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.