Legal Opinion
State v. Norton
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1934No. File No. Cr. 114PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of the crime of engaging in the liquor traffic in that he "wilfully and unlawfully did sell, deliver, transport, furnish and possess intoxicating liquor then and there fit and intended for beverage purposes and containing more than five per cent. of alcohol by volume."
The specifications of error are in two general classes — one class dealing with the whole subject of the public policy of this state regarding intoxicating liquors, and the other with the constitutional qualifications of jurors.
Defendant says that, because of the repeal of article 20 of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- American Publishing Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Agnew v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Egbert v. City of DunseithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- People Ex Rel. Denny v. TraegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re House Bill No. 145Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- State v. HougeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.