Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2013No. S-12-1049PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 96 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS appointment of counsel.22 Where the assigned errors in the postconviction petition before the district court are either pro­ cedurally barred or without merit, establishing that the post­ conviction proceeding contained no justiciable issue of law or fact, it is not an abuse of discretion to fail to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant.23 As we have noted, Phelps has not alleged facts sufficient to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing on his postconviction claim, and thus has raised no justiciable issue of law or fact. The district court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Reitz v. RingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. DallmannNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Manske v. ManskeNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Cross v. PerretenNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Heckman v. MarchioNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Mann v. MannNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. In re Interest of Luz P.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API