Legal Opinion

United States v. Kern

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 26, 1934No. Nos. 5740, 5824, 5735, 5836, 5715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The five above-entitled actions are eiyil actions brought by the United States of America, on bonds given in support of permits to use specially denatured alcohol, in manufacturing approved preparations of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA).

These eases come before the court on motions to sustain their pleas of the statute of limitations and to dismiss the complaints as to the Eagle Indemnity Company and the Royal Indemnity Company.

The defendants Eagle Indemnity Company and Royal Indemnity Company interposed motions to dismiss because the complaints failed to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. O'Sullivan v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Lipke v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Various Items of Personal Property v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WeaverDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1952
  2. United States v. Van Schaack Bros. Chemical Works, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1940
  3. United States v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API