Legal Opinion

State v. Rolack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 11, 2013No. 5D12-3145PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvander, J.

The State of Florida seeks certiorari review of an order excluding two witnesses from testifying at trial. We conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in excluding these witnesses and, accordingly, grant the petition.

Respondent, Gene Marcellous Rolack, was charged with committing a sexual battery upon A.B., an adult female. The alleged incident occurred at A.B.’s residence on November 16, 2011. Shortly thereafter, A.B. advised her long-time friend, Simone Fernandez, of the event and, at Fernandez’s prodding, notified law enforcement.

*1287The State filed its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. State v. PettisSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. McDuffie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. State v. FarleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Anthony C. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. State v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Ward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Roy Harold Bissember v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  5. State v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API