Legal Opinion
State v. Farley
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 25, 2001No. 5D01-473PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
788 So.2d 338 (2001)
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Matthew D. FARLEY, Respondent.
No. 5D01-473.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 25, 2001.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Schumann, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner.
Francis V. Iennaco of LeBlanc & Iennaco, Orlando, for Respondent.
ORFINGER, R.B., J.
The State seeks certiorari review of a trial court order excluding a witness from testifying at trial because the witness failed to attend a scheduled deposition. Because lesser sanctions had not been attempted or shown to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Wilcox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- State v. SchwartzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- State v. GorrioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RolackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Ward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- State v. GillisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Ward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019