Legal Opinion

Rubenstein v. Slobotkin

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 22, 1929No. 3814PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an action in equity in which plaintiff prays for relief by injunction, accounting, and damages for the alleged infringement by the defendant of patent No. 1,672,040, issued by the United States Patent Office to Nathan Ribenstein, for steam-pressing iron, dated June 5,1928, application filed July 17,1925.

The defense urged on the trial was invalidity, and a counterclaim was interposed by the defendant of the alleged infringement by the plaintiff of claim 1 of reissue patent No. 16,847, issued by the United States Patent Office to Nathan Slobotkin, for sadiron,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J. A. Mohr & Son v. Alliance Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  2. Autopiano Co. v. American Player Action Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Metropolitan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Henry v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  5. Gibson v. Smoot Engineering Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  2. Hall v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1944
  3. Tumbler v. Baltimore Paint & Color Works, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935
  4. Buono v. Yankee Maid Dress Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
  5. George v. ThucakyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API