Sugarland Industries v. Daily
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Judge Smedley
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.
The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the district court in favor of plaintiff in error and remanded the cause on account of statements made by plaintiffs in error’s counsel in his argument to the jury. 124 S. W. (2d) 199.
Defendant in error, Daily, sued plaintiff in error, Sugarland Industries, for damages by reason of personal injuries suffered by his wife in a collision on a public highway between an automobile driven by Mrs. Daily and a truck owned by plaintiff in error and operated by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. Southern Traction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1921
- W. A. Morgan & Bros. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
- J. S. Abercrombie Co. v. DelcomynTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Taylor v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Daily v. Sugarland IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- RT Herrin Petroleum Transport Co. v. ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Whited v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Texas & New Orleans Ry. Co. v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Cannady v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Wright v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.