Albert Pavlik and Anna H. Pavlik v. Consolidation Coal Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns a dispute about the interpretation of the defeasance clause of an easement for a “pipeline for transportation of coal slurry.” The easement had been granted by appellants’ predecessors in title to the land affected, to the predecessors in title of the appellee. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and, hence, Ohio law applies. The District Judge who heard this case on a record consisting entirely of stipulated facts held that the fact that the pipeline had not been used for over one year to transport coal slurry, but was being…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Florida Canada Corporation v. Union Carbide & Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Courtright v. ScrimgerOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Great Lakes Towing Co. v. Bethlehem Transp. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Grundstein v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Courcier v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1824
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Edwin R. O'Neill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Oman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979
- Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Philip Alan Froude, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc., and Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.