Legal Opinion
Harriette Bannister, Charles J. Crosby and W. C. Neal v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 18, 1967No. 23351_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge:
The appellants Bannister, Crosby and Neal were convicted by a jury under an indictment charging two counts of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341, and one count of conspiracy to violate the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 371. 1 Of the several errors asserted on this appeal, only two warrant comment — whether the evidence established that there had been use of the mails within the meaning of § 1341, and whether the District Court erred in refusing to allow Crosby or his counsel access to Crosby’s pre-sen-, fence report. We find no error and affirm.
The substance of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wayne Rosser Abbott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Glenn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Ronald F. CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, George L. OnettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Moises Benmuhar, United States of America v. William Pacheco NievesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. K. C. Edwards, A/K/A Kermit EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.