Legal Opinion
Moye v. Selsky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 2, 1993No. 90 Civ. 2503(RJW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kelvin Moye has 'moved, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for partial summary judgment in this action. 1 Defendants Donald Selsky and Roland Cote (“defendants”) have cross-moved, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ. P., for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion is granted and defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
At all times relevant to this action, plaintiff ' was incarcerated in the Sing Sing Correctional Facility (“Sing Sing”), which is operated by the New York State Department of Correctional…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jerry Young A/K/A Ramadan v. Donald Selsky, P. Orengo, R. Althouse, R.J. Cunningham, D. Schaller, L. JewettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Jermosen v. CoughlinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Gilbert v. SelskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Gaston v. CoughlinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994
- Sealey v. CoughlinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.