Legal Opinion

Consolidated Gas Co. v. Rieckhoff

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1944No. 8401PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This appeal is from a judgment quieting title to certain oil lands in the plaintiff, the Consolidated Gas Company. The appealing defendant, E. O. Rieckhoff, claims an interest in the land by reason of a lease and drilling agreement between the plaintiff’s predecessor, Katherine L. Jones, and Rieckhoff.

Under the terms of the agreement Rieckhoff was granted a term of two years and as long thereafter as oil or gas was pro duced. The lease also specified that, if drilling was not commenced within the dates specified, by payment of a rental fee an extension could be had. The original lease started…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. J. Fagan & Co. v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hicks v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Simons v. McDanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Simpson v. Buckner's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reickhoff v. Consolidated Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Edington v. Creek Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bain v. Portable Drilling Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Miami Oil Producers, Inc. v. LarsonMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lindner v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API