Legal Opinion

People v. Condarco

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided September 28, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph A. Grosso, J.

Defendant Condarco is charged in a misdemeanor information with Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2) and defendant Cuellar is charged in a separate misdemeanor information with Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2) and (3). The issues raised by defense counsel are identical in each case and I have joined these cases for decision.

*472In each case, the defendant is alleged to have had operated a motor vehicle while having a blood alcohol level in excess of .10 of 1%. In each case, pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193 (2) (e) (7) (a) and (b), the defendant’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  2. State v. SavardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  3. Barnes v. TofanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Price v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Rushworth v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. County Court of Essex CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. GerstnerNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. MacDougallJustice Court of Town of Brighton · 1995
  4. People v. AlvarezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API