Taylor v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Bobbitt, J.
I cannot agree with the majority opinion for the following reasons:
*409Warner v. State (1924), 194 Ind. 426, 143 N. E. 288, upon which the majority opinion is based, has no application to the facts in this case. In the Warner case defendant-Warner was arraigned and entered a plea of guilty on April 23, 1921. On May 11, 1921 he was released on his own recognizance pending further order of the court. On October 2, 1922, defendant was produced in court by the sheriff under order of the court, at which time judgment was entered that he be fined and committed to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Kostas v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- Maroney v. TannehillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- People ex rel. O'Connell v. NoonanIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Warner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.