Legal Opinion

Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 19, 1983No. 83 Civ. 5113PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

This action, together with 83-5601 and 83-5604, arises out of the planned redemption of $125 million in 16% Sinking Fund Debentures (“the Debentures”) by the defendant ADM Midland Company (“ADM”) scheduled to take place on Monday, August 1st, 1983. Morgan Stanley & Company, Inc. (“Morgan Stanley”) brings this suit under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.15 U.S.C. § 78j, § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q, §§ 323(a) and 316(b) of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939.15 U.S.C. §§ 77www(a), 77ppp(b), and other state and federal laws,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,956 David Broad v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. 67 Wall Street Co. v. Franklin National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of Israel, Government of Israel, Third-Party v. American Arbitration Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Allied Capital Corp. v. GC-Sun Holdings, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  3. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. v. MathesonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. ABN AMRO, Inc. v. Capital International Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API